Have you seen that great Albert Brook's film, Defending Your Life?
If you have Starz!, then no doubt you've caught at least part of the film in the past couple weeks. Defending Your Life is to Starz! as Selena is TNT. Both are played in a seemingly endless loop -- a loop mind you, that I'll sit through without fail.
The scheduling of Defending Your Life coincided perfectly with Ben and my own attempts to defend ourselves with regard to unemployment pay.
Over the past couple months we -- two somewhat intelligent people, both with tech backgrounds and university degrees -- have failed miserably at submitting a valid unemployment pay form.
Now, I'm just going to say that we aren't idiots and that there is some sort of conspiracy to (1) deprive anyone who isn't down with the system of their rightfully earned money (2) make you feel like a criminal if you file an appeal based on their arbitrary judgements.
Unemployment is insurance paid by your employers, for goodness sake!
Because we had submitted our fourth "invalid" (they said we mailed in blank forms) unemployment claim and we had filed appeals, we were both scheduled to have phone interviews.
After Ben's interview went strangely well (it was just pleasant small-talk), he had the foresight to make a jokingly accurate observation:
"I hope these interviews won't be like our own version of Defending Your Life."
Meaning, I, as the Albert Brooks of the house, was in for a lot of trouble.
When my call did come -- two hours earlier than they had scheduled -- I was asleep. After trying to gain my composure and speaking voice, I realized quickly that Ben had been spot on with his prediction.
Question after question, the appeals agent bombarded me with impossible scenarios regarding the trip we took to Los Angeles.
Agent: So, you went to Los Angeles for a week?
Me: Yes. But we were looking for jobs while were in L.A.
Agent: Did you actively look for work?
Me: Yes.
Agent: Did you turn down any work?
Me: No.
Agent: What time did you leave for Los Angeles?
Me: What? I don't remember -- 9 AM?
Agent: So, you left at 9 am?
Mena: Yes, I think so.
Agent: What if someone had called at 8 am and offered you a job?
Mena: That wouldn't happen.
Agent: If someone offered you a job at 8 am would you have been able to start work that day?
Mena: Really, that wouldn't happen.
Agent: Answer the question, please.
It's then when I start to freak out.
Mena: That wouldn't happen! That's impossible. I'm a designer. I haven't even received an interview call back! No one would call me at 8 am without a prior interview and ask me to come in that morning.
Agent: So you would have refused the work.
Mena: I'm just saying that in my field, this is an impossible scenario. Maybe if I had an interview and an offer pending, I wouldn't have gone to LA. You're usually given a start date and it's never "start this moment."
Agent: So you would have refused the work.
Mena: I give up. Yes, I would have started at 9 am. I wouldn't have gone to Los Angeles. I would have turned around if we were in the car.
I'm foolishly stubborn about matters like this. Because it was an improbable answer, I couldn't force myself to give the simple "yes" that he wanted to hear.
About two weeks ago, I received a letter saying that my appeal had been denied and I was now supposed to appear in front of a judge to plead my case.
Keep in mind this is for a lousy $230 a week.
I called up the claims office and told them to basically screw the appeal. The money wasn't worth the hassles. And what did they say?
"A judge will have to decide if you can drop the appeal."
So, have you had better luck with this process? I think they just make it more difficult for Californians.